解决方法就是在order by ID desc再加一个排序的字段，这样子可能会把速度提高很多。再加止排序的字段因查询而异了
如表
复制代码 代码如下:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[CMPP_SendCentre] (
[id] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL ,
[SendType] [varchar] (10) COLLATE Chinese_PRC_CI_AS NOT NULL ,
[SendDate] [datetime] NOT NULL ,
[Port] [varchar] (50) COLLATE Chinese_PRC_CI_AS NOT NULL ,
[Service_ID] [varchar] (20) COLLATE Chinese_PRC_CI_AS NOT NULL ,
[FeeType] [varchar] (2) COLLATE Chinese_PRC_CI_AS NOT NULL ,
[FeeCode] [varchar] (6) COLLATE Chinese_PRC_CI_AS NOT NULL ,
[Msg_Content] [varchar] (1024) COLLATE Chinese_PRC_CI_AS NOT NULL ,
[SendCount] [int] NOT NULL ,
[SucceedCount] [int] NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[CMPP_SendCentreMo] (
[id] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL ,
[SendCentreID] [int] NOT NULL ,
[Mo] [varchar] (20) COLLATE Chinese_PRC_CI_AS NOT NULL ,
[Stat] [varchar] (10) COLLATE Chinese_PRC_CI_AS NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CMPP_SendCentreMo.SendCentreID 与CMPP_SendCentre.ID成外建关系
于是建了一个视图
复制代码 代码如下:
CREATE VIEW dbo.ViewCMPP_SendCentreMo
AS
SELECT
dbo.CMPP_SendCentreMo.id,
dbo.CMPP_SendCentreMo.SendCentreID,
dbo.CMPP_SendCentreMo.Mo,
dbo.CMPP_SendCentreMo.Stat,
dbo.CMPP_SendCentre.SendType,
dbo.CMPP_SendCentre.SendDate,
dbo.CMPP_SendCentre.Port,
dbo.CMPP_SendCentre.Service_ID,
case dbo.CMPP_SendCentre.FeeType when '01' then '免费' when '02' then '点播' else '包月' end as FeeType,
cast(dbo.CMPP_SendCentre.FeeCode as smallint) as FeeCode,
dbo.CMPP_SendCentre.Msg_Content
FROM dbo.CMPP_SendCentre INNER JOIN
dbo.CMPP_SendCentreMo ON
dbo.CMPP_SendCentre.id = dbo.CMPP_SendCentreMo.SendCentreID
一开始的查询语句为
复制代码 代码如下:
select top 6*from [ViewCMPP_SendCentreMo]
where SendType = '扣费'
order by id desc
发现非常的慢
经过了解,原因是order by id desc/asc的查询是一行一行的找数据,所以非常的慢
于是改成了
复制代码 代码如下:
select top 6*from [ViewCMPP_SendCentreMo]
where SendType = '扣费'
order by SendCentreID desc, id desc
查询就非常的快了
【SQL order by ID desc/asc加一个排序的字段解决查询慢问题】相关文章：
★ SQL Server 2000中修改数据库COLLATE的实例
★ sql server 2008 r2 express 精简版与企业版的区别
★ SQL Server 2008 阻止保存要求重新创建表的更改问题的设置方法
★ SqlServer 2005中使用row_number()在一个查询中删除重复记录